A Study on Integration of Hydroponics in Architecture: Qualitative Approach

https://doi.org/10.46610/JoRAAS.2026.v011i01.005

Abstract

Urban areas face major challenges such as limited green space, heat stress, and resource scarcity. Hydroponics offers sustainable potential through building integration, yet practical, low-cost strategies for varied scales remain underexplored. This study examines how system selection, integration location, and design approach affect the feasibility and performance of hydroponic building integration, comparing DIY residential setups with commercial installations. Using a qualitative comparative case study, it analyses two contrasting projects—RV Singh Hydroponic Farm (DIY residential, Bareilly) and One Central Park (commercial, Sydney)—across six criteria: system suitability, integration method, material choice, spatial use, accessibility, and climate response. A comparative framework evaluates six systems (NFT, DWC, Drip, Ebb & Flow, Aeroponics, and Wick) and four building locations (façade, roof, balcony, and interior). Findings show that DIY systems can achieve environmental and spatial benefits comparable to commercial ones at ~70% lower cost, disproving the notion that only professional systems are viable. NFT and Drip systems show the highest adaptability across residential and commercial uses. The study concludes with a decision framework linking system choice to building type, structure, cost, and maintenance ease.