An Assessment of Traditional Versus Advanced Open-Source Technology
Keywords:
Data Science (DS), High Availability (HA), Machine Learning (ML), Open-Source Software (OSS), Open-Source Technology (OST)Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive assessment of traditional versus advanced data processing methods, with a particular focus on analysis, improvement, and the acceleration of modern processing techniques. The primary objective is to design and develop advanced, cost-effective tools that maximize productivity, enhance decision-making, and align with contemporary innovation standards while minimizing both operational costs and time requirements. Our approach emphasizes the processing and analysis of unstructured data using open-source technologies such as Python, R, and modern shell scripting, effectively converting raw data into structured training datasets. These tools are employed to optimize the utilization of human and material resources, encompassing machines, markets, methods, and finances. The proposed framework further aims to create an intelligent system that strengthens user interfaces, fosters collaboration among colleagues, and streamlines the management of contacts, contracts, and updates. By enhancing the responsiveness and stability of operational systems, this work contributes to durability improvement, quality enhancement, cost control, better decision-making, and risk mitigation.
References
A. Khanjani and R. Sulaiman, “The process of quality assurance under open source software development,” 2011 IEEE Symposium on Computers & Informatics, Mar. 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/isci.2011.5958975.
A. Mockus, R. T. Fielding, and J. D. Herbsleb, “Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla,” ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 309–346, Jul. 2002, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/567793.567795
S. S. Bahamdain, “Open Source Software (OSS) Quality Assurance: A Survey Paper,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 56, pp. 459–464, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.236
S. Bhattacharya, B. Czejdo, R. Agrawal, E. Erdemir, and B. Gokaraju, “Open Source Platforms and Frameworks for Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning,” IEEE Xplore, Apr. 01, 2018. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8479098
S. Rajapaksha and J. Senanayake, “AI-Powered Vulnerability Detection for Secure Source Code Development,” Lecture notes in computer science, pp. 275–288, Jan. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32636-3_16
F. Richard. Paige, “When are methods complementary?” Information and Software Technology, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 157–162, Feb. 1999, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0950-5849(98)00119-0
V. K. Gurbani, A. R. Garvert, and J. D. Herbsleb, “A case study of a corporate open source development model,” ICSE ’06: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering, May 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/1134285.1134352
C. Dell’Era, A. Di Minin, G. Ferrigno, F. Frattini, P. Landoni, and R. Verganti, “Value capture in open innovation processes with radical circles: A qualitative analysis of firms’ collaborations with Slow Food, Memphis, and Free Software Foundation,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 158, p. 120128, Sep. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120128
W. Scacchi, “Free and open source development practices in the game community,” IEEE Software, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 59–66, Jan. 2004, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ms.2004.1259221
DiBona C, Ockman S. Open sources: Voices from the open source revolution. " O'Reilly Media, Inc."; 1999 Jan 3.
