Advances in Weed Detection: A Comparative Review of Deep Learning and Sensor-Based Methodologies
Keywords:
Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Precision agriculture, Transfer learning, Weed detection, Weed management, Weed speciesAbstract
Weed detection remains a critical task in the domain of precision agriculture, directly influencing crop yield optimization, resource management, and the reduction of chemical herbicide usage. Accurate and timely identification of weeds enables site-specific weed management, minimizing environmental impact and enhancing overall agricultural productivity. With recent advancements in deep learning, computer vision, and sensor technologies, a wide range of automated weed detection methods have emerged, offering promising alternatives to traditional manual or chemical-based approaches. This review paper provides a comprehensive analysis of state-of-the-art techniques used for weed detection, focusing primarily on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), object detection models such as YOLO (You Only Look Once) and Faster R-CNN, semantic segmentation frameworks like U-Net and DeepLab, and various sensor-based approaches including multispectral and hyperspectral imaging. Each method is evaluated based on critical performance indicators such as mean Average Precision (mAP), recall, precision, F1 score, and computational efficiency, with an emphasis on real-world applicability. The review also highlights major challenges encountered in the development and deployment of these systems, including variability in environmental conditions (lighting, occlusion, background clutter), the generalization capability of trained models across different crop and weed species, and the feasibility of real-time field implementation. In addition, a comparative analysis is presented to synthesize the strengths and limitations of different approaches. Based on the insights gained, the paper outlines several future research directions, including the integration of multimodal data, transfer learning, few-shot learning, and edge computing, to further improve the robustness and scalability of weed detection systems in precision agriculture.
References
J. M. López-Correa, H. Moreno, A. Ribeiro, and D. Andújar, “Intelligent weed management based on object detection neural networks in tomato crops,” Agronomy, vol. 12, no. 12, p. 2953, Nov. 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12122953
B. Deng, Y. Lu, and J. Xu, “Weed database development: An updated survey of public weed datasets and cross-season weed detection adaptation,” Ecological Informatics, vol. 81, p. 102546, Jul. 1, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102546
M. Sportelli, O. E. Apolo-Apolo, M. Fontanelli, C. Frasconi, M. Raffaelli, A. Peruzzi, and M. Perez-Ruiz, “Evaluation of YOLO object detectors for weed detection in different turfgrass scenarios,” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 14, p. 8502, Jul. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13148502
J. Zhao, G. Tian, C. Qiu, B. Gu, K. Zheng, and Q. Liu, “Weed detection in potato fields based on improved YOLOv4: Optimal speed and accuracy of weed detection in potato fields,” Electronics, vol. 11, no. 22, p. 3709, Nov. 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11223709
M. U. Rehman, H. Eesaar, Z. Abbas, L. Seneviratne, I. Hussain, and K. T. Chong, “Advanced drone-based weed detection using feature-enriched deep learning approach,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 305, p. 112655, Dec. 3, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2024.112655
M. H. Saleem, J. Potgieter, and K. M. Arif, “Weed detection by faster RCNN model: An enhanced anchor box approach,” Agronomy, vol. 12, no. 7, p. 1580, Jun. 29, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12071580
H. Yu, M. Che, H. Yu, and J. Zhang, “Development of weed detection method in soybean fields utilizing improved Deeplabv3+ platform,” Agronomy, vol. 12, no. 11, p. 2889, Nov. 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112889
H. Zhu, Y. Zhang, D. Mu, L. Bai, X. Wu, H. Zhuang, and H. Li, “Research on improved YOLOx weed detection based on lightweight attention module,” Crop Protection, vol. 177, Art. no. 106563, Mar. 1, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106563
A. Subeesh, S. Bhole, K. Singh, N. S. Chandel, Y. A. Rajwade, K. V. Rao, S. P. Kumar, and D. Jat, “Deep convolutional neural network models for weed detection in polyhouse grown bell peppers,” Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture, vol. 6, pp. 47–54, Jan. 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiia.2022.01.002
A. Piron, F. van der Heijden, and M. F. Destain, “Weed detection in 3D images,” Precision Agriculture, vol. 12, pp. 607–622, Oct. 2011. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-010-9205-2
G. G. Peteinatos, M. Weis, D. Andújar, V. R. Ayala, and R. Gerhards, “Potential use of ground‐based sensor technologies for weed detection,” Pest Management Science, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 190–199, Feb. 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3677
A. Liu and R. Bruch, “Weed detection for selective spraying: a review,” Current Robotics Reports, vol. 1, pp. 19–26, Mar. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43154-020-00001-w
N. Islam, M. M. Rashid, S. Wibowo, C. Y. Xu, A. Morshed, S. A. Wasimi, S. Moore, and S. M. Rahman, “Early weed detection using image processing and machine learning techniques in an Australian chilli farm,” Agriculture, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 387, Apr. 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11050387
H. Zhang, Z. Wang, Y. Guo, Y. Ma, W. Cao, D. Chen, S. Yang, and R. Gao, “Weed detection in peanut fields based on machine vision,” Agriculture, vol. 12, no. 10, p. 1541, Sep. 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12101541